Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/143636
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.advisorMorales De La Nuez, Antonio José-
dc.contributor.advisorMartín Barrasa, José Luis-
dc.contributor.authorReyes Del Moral, Ariadna-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-27T20:04:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-27T20:04:54Z-
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.otherGestión académica
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/143636-
dc.description.abstractThe antimicrobial resistance problem has increased significantly over the last decades. As antibiotics has been a weapon against all kind of diseases since they were discovered, the overuse leaded to multiple resistances that slowly built an international problem where it takes much more dosage to fight illnesses. To minimise the risk of developing more resistance, several studies has been searching for new antimicrobial treatments that does not include antibiotics. In this study, we evaluated the antimicrobial activity of two goat’s cathelicidins, SC5 and Bactenecin 3.4 against Escherichia coli (E.coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) strains. With this in view, both minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericide concentration (MBC) were determined with the broth microdilution method using 48 strains of E. coli and 48 strains of S. aureus against goat’s peptides SC5 and Bac3.4. Susceptibility tests were also performed for all the strains. Comparing the results from both peptides, SC5 showed a greater and consistent antimicrobial activity than Bac3.4, specially against S. aureus. It is true that our results differ from other studies when it comes to Proline/Arginine-rich peptides (PAR-HDPs), the same kind as Bac3.4, but this may be due the strain variability, the methodology used and the structural modifications between peptides.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.subject310905 Microbiologíaen_US
dc.subject310908 Farmacologíaen_US
dc.subject310407 Ovinosen_US
dc.titleAntimicrobial activity of SC5 and Bactenecin 3.4. from Capra aegagrus hircusen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US
dc.typeBachelorThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departamentoDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentosen_US
dc.contributor.facultadFacultad de Veterinariaen_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Trabajo final de gradoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.matriculaTFT-33308
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.titulacionGrado en Veterinaria
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.advisor.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.advisor.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.advisor.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.advisor.deptGIR IUSA-ONE HEALTH 2 - Sanidad Animal de la Acuicultura y Especies Silvestres, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.advisor.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.advisor.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
Colección:Trabajo final de grado
Vista resumida

Visitas

106
actualizado el 16-ene-2026

Google ScholarTM

Verifica


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.