Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/133626
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.advisorMorales De La Nuez, Antonio José-
dc.contributor.advisorCastro Navarro, Noemí-
dc.contributor.authorBarrio García, Paula-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-07T10:33:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-07T10:33:52Z-
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.otherGestión académica
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/133626-
dc.description.abstractGoat importance around the world have increased significantly over the last decades. In the case of Europe, the dairy goat farms are of special interest nowadays. The early intake of colostrum is vital for newborn goat kids to ensure a proper passive immunity transfer which is crucial to improve the survival rates and disease resistance. To minimise the risk of pathogens transmission through colostrum, several sanitation treatments have been studied, such as heat treatments, SDS addition, among others. In this study, the efficacy of treating colostrum with chlorine dioxide (ClO2) at two different doses has been evaluated as an alternative to conventional sanitisation methods. The aim was to know the ClO2 effect on bacterial growth and IgG concentration in goat colostrum. For this purpose, 15 samples of colostrum from Majorera goats were divided into four aliquots, each one receiving different treatments, as follows: colostrum without treatment, colostrum heated at 56°C for 1 hour, colostrum treated with chlorine dioxide at 400 µg/L and colostrum treated with chlorine dioxide at 800 µg/L. Analyses of the main bacterial groups and IgG were determined. Heat treatment (56ºC for 1 hour) significantly reduced bacterial population, whereas the bacterial counts between untreated colostrum and colostrum treated with chlorine dioxide at any of the doses tested were similar. Conversely, all treatments assayed reduced IgG concentration, compared to untreated samples. The findings show that the addition of 400 or 800 µg/L of chlorine dioxide to goat colostrum is not efficient in reducing bacterial population neither maintaining an optimal IgG concentrationen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.subject3104 Producción Animalen_US
dc.subject310407 Ovinosen_US
dc.titleUse of Chlorine Dioxide on goat colostrum sanitationen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US
dc.typeBachelorThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departamentoDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentosen_US
dc.contributor.facultadFacultad de Veterinariaen_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Trabajo final de gradoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.matriculaTFT-21330
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.titulacionGrado en Veterinaria
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.advisor.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.advisor.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.advisor.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.advisor.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.advisor.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.advisor.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
Colección:Trabajo final de grado
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.