Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/123505
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorMD Ruiz Díazen_US
dc.contributor.authorMorales De La Nuez, Antonio Joséen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlexandr Torresen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Indias,Isabelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Macías,Daviniaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCastro Navarro, Noemíen_US
dc.contributor.authorArgüello Henríquez, Anastasioen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-14T07:55:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-14T07:55:08Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/123505-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different pasteurization methods and different technological treatments as skim or rennet on the antimicrobial activity in goat colostrum against Escherichia coli. The first postpartum colostrum from ten dairy Majorera goats was collected by a milker bucket. The obtained colostrum was divided in six aliquiots (50ml) and storage at -80°C until analysis were performed later on. Colostrum samples were defrosted and heated at 37°C in a water bath and, after that, the different treatments were applied, except on control samples. The pasteurization was performed using three different methods, at 56°C during 1 hour, 63°C during 30 minutes and 72°C during 15 seconds. Another colostrum aliquot (50ml) was skimmed by using a commercial skimmer. The final aliquot was clotted by using commercial rennet and colostrum whey obtained was recovered after centrifugation. Ten microlitres of each sample were imbibed in a sterile antibiogram disk and let to dry. Sterile saline serum and Enrofloxacin (250 microgram) were used as negative and positive control, respectively. Two hundred microliters of E. coli (ABS 600 nm = 3) were plating into Petri dishes with violet red bile agar medium. In each Petri dish, 4 antibiogram disks (positive and negative controls and two samples to test) were located and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. After that, halos were measured using a digital scanner. A Proc Mixed procedure was performed by SAS statistic package. Assuming positive control as 100% of antimicrobial activity and negative control as 0% of antimicrobial activity, the percentages of the different samples were as follow: control samples (without treatment) 14.78%, pasteurization at 56°C during 1 hour 12.28%, pasteurization at 63°C during 30 minutes 14.48%, pasteurization at 72°C during 15 seconds 9.71%, whey colostrum 6.35% and skimmed colostrum 16.22%. As preliminary conclusion, pasteurization (at 56 and 63°C) and skimmed did not affect significantly the colostrum antimicrobial activity, although pasteurization at 72°C and colostrum whey decreased the antimicrobial activity of goat colostrum.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Goat Associationen_US
dc.source10th International Conference on Goatsen_US
dc.subject3104 Producción Animalen_US
dc.titleEffect of different treatments on colostrum antimicrobial activityen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/lectureen_US
dc.typeLectureen_US
dc.relation.conference10th International Conference on Goats - Technological Development and Associate Attempts to a Sustainable Small Livestock Activityen_US
dc.description.lastpage62en_US
dc.description.firstpage62en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Ponenciaen_US
dc.description.numberofpages1en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateSeptiembre 2010en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate19-09-2010-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate23-09-2010-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0184-2037-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3026-2031-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4426-0678-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameMorales De La Nuez, Antonio José-
crisitem.author.fullNameMoreno Indias,Isabel-
crisitem.author.fullNameSánchez Macías,Davinia-
crisitem.author.fullNameCastro Navarro, Noemí-
crisitem.author.fullNameArgüello Henríquez, Anastasio-
Colección:Ponencias
Adobe PDF (286,56 kB)
Vista resumida

Visitas

29
actualizado el 03-ago-2024

Descargas

13
actualizado el 03-ago-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.