Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/123481
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Díaz, M. Den_US
dc.contributor.authorCapote Álvarez, Juan Franciscoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSein, C .en_US
dc.contributor.authorArgüello Henríquez, Anastasioen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Indias,Isabelen_US
dc.contributor.authorHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enriqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorCastro Navarro, Noemíen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T10:20:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-13T10:20:54Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/123481-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of present study was to identify the effect of milking frequency on immune status of dairy goats. Eleven dairy Majorera goats in the middle lactation were milked during 5 weeks at different milking frequencies. The first and fifth week, goats were milked once a day (09:00), the second and fourth week goats were milked twice a day (09:00, 17:00), and the third week goats were milked three times a day (09:00, 13:00, 19:00). Blood samples were taken once a week each Wednesday. White blood cells count (WBCC) was measured and, after that, blood was centrifuged and the plasma fraction storage at -80°C until subsequent analysis. IgG, IgM and complement system activity (Classical plus alternative and alternative pathway alone) were evaluated. A Proc Mixed procedure was performed by SAS statistic package. Mean blood plasma IgG was 26.7, 17.8, 9.8, 11.7 and 14.8 mg/ml at week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Blood plasma IgG was significantly higher at week 1 than other periods studied and the level of IgG was reduced as milking frequency was high. Blood plasma IgM was 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1 and 1.3 mg/ml at week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. The highest blood plasma IgM was observed at week 5, showing an increase trend during the experimental time. WBCC was 14.0, 14.0, 15.0, 13.9 and 13.5x103 cells/ml at week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. WBCC at week 3 was significantly higher than at week 5, although a trend was observed while milking frequency increased the WBCC concomitant increased. Complement system activity measured as Classical plus alternative pathways activation was 44.7, 47.0, 55.2, 71.7 and 71.7 % at week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Complement activity measured as alternative pathway alone was 28.8, 31.8, 39.2, 42.0 and 40.9 % at week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Complement activity measured as classical plus alternative pathways and alternative pathway alone were affected (increasing) by milking frequency during the first three weeks, and after that the complement activity still increased. As a preliminary conclusion, milking frequency affect in a different way the innate and acquired immune status of dairy goats. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Goat Associationen_US
dc.source10th International Conference on Goat, p. 60-61en_US
dc.subject3104 Producción Animalen_US
dc.titleEffects of milking frequency on goat immune statusen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/lectureen_US
dc.typeLectureen_US
dc.relation.conference10th International Conference on Goats - Technological Development and Associate Attempts to a Sustainable Small Livestock Activityen_US
dc.description.lastpage61en_US
dc.description.firstpage60en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Ponenciaen_US
dc.description.numberofpages2en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateSeptiembre 2010en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate19-09-2010-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate23-09-2010-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4426-0678-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2729-0434-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3026-2031-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameCapote Álvarez, Juan Francisco-
crisitem.author.fullNameArgüello Henríquez, Anastasio-
crisitem.author.fullNameMoreno Indias,Isabel-
crisitem.author.fullNameHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enrique-
crisitem.author.fullNameCastro Navarro, Noemí-
Colección:Ponencias
Adobe PDF (330,31 kB)
Vista resumida

Visitas

44
actualizado el 04-ago-2024

Descargas

11
actualizado el 04-ago-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.