Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/123479
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorMorales De La Nuez, Antonio Joséen_US
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Díaz, M. D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Indias,Isabelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Macías,Daviniaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enriqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorCastro Navarro, Noemíen_US
dc.contributor.authorArgüello Henríquez, Anastasioen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T10:16:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-13T10:16:54Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/123479-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Glycerol (Gli) and Propylene Glycol (Pro) at different concentrations as additive during goat colostrum pasteurization. Eleven goats of Majorera breed were milked, using a bucket milker, immediately after partum. After removed the whole available colostrum, that was aliquoted (50 ml) and subsequently frozen at −20°C until treatment. Sampled colostrums were allotted into nine different groups according to treatments with different additives. In control group (CG) 14% of Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) was added to colostrum, while in experimental groups colostrum was complemented with different doses of PBS plus diverse percentages of Glycerol or Propylene Glycol. All additions to colostrum were standardized to 14%. After each addition, colostrum samples were heated in a water bath until reach 56ºC; after that, the samples remained for 1 hour more into the water bath at 56ºC. Subsequently samples were transferred to ice water for fast cooling and storage at 4°C until microbiological analyses were performed later on. Colostrum microbiological population was quantified according to standard procedures on Plate Count Agar. No significant differences between Glycerol and Propylene glycol addition were found at any concentration tested. However, colostrum microbial population was significantly higher in CG samples than in all Glycerol and Propylene glycol groups. As Glycerol or Propylene glycol concentration added was increasing a significant reduction of the microbial population was observed, although no significant differences between groups were observed when 10 or 14% of Glycerol or Propylene glycol was added. In conclusion, according to the preliminary results, the addition of Glycerol or Propylene Glycol before goat colostrum pasteurization is an effective method to reduce the colostrum micro biota. Further studies on the effect of these additives on the different microbial populations will be necessary.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Goat Associationen_US
dc.source10th International Conference on Goats, p. 57-58en_US
dc.subject3104 Producción Animalen_US
dc.titleThe use of Glycerol and Propylene glycol as additives during pasteurization reduce the microbial population in colostrum goatsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/lectureen_US
dc.typeLectureen_US
dc.relation.conference10th International Conference on Goats - Technological Development and Associate Attempts to a Sustainable Small Livestock Activityen_US
dc.description.lastpage58en_US
dc.description.firstpage57en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Ponenciaen_US
dc.description.numberofpages2en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateSeptiembre 2010en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate19-09-2010-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate23-09-2010-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0184-2037-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2729-0434-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3026-2031-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4426-0678-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameMorales De La Nuez, Antonio José-
crisitem.author.fullNameMoreno Indias,Isabel-
crisitem.author.fullNameSánchez Macías,Davinia-
crisitem.author.fullNameHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enrique-
crisitem.author.fullNameCastro Navarro, Noemí-
crisitem.author.fullNameArgüello Henríquez, Anastasio-
Colección:Ponencias
Adobe PDF (293,07 kB)
Vista resumida

Visitas

56
actualizado el 03-ago-2024

Descargas

13
actualizado el 03-ago-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.