Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/123473
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Macías,Daviniaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMorales De La Nuez, Antonio Joséen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Indias,Isabelen_US
dc.contributor.authorFresno, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArgüello Henríquez, Anastasioen_US
dc.contributor.authorCastro Navarro, Noemíen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T08:42:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-13T08:42:32Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/123473-
dc.description.abstractMajorera goat milk with three different fat content (5%, 1.5% and 0.4% fat) were obtained using a skimmer and goat cheese were prepared by traditional method from Canary Islands (Spain) with these 3 types of milk. Milk and cheese whey samples were analyzed for: pH, gross chemical composition and density; percentage of proteins was determinate with electrophoresis in SDS-PAGE gel. It was observed that milk pH decreased as fat content was lower. However cheese whey pH decreased slightly as milk fat content was lower but no statistically significant differences between the three types of whey were observed. The remaining fat percentage in cheese whey was significantly minor as milk fat content was reduced (remaining 10, 4 and 0% cheese whey fat content from full-, reduced- and low-fat milk, respectively). The protein in milk decreased slightly as fat is removed by centrifugation. Protein content in whey was 3 times lower than in milk but no significant differences were found between the three types of cheese whey. Lactose in milk ranged from 4.5 to 5%, increasing significantly as fat content decreased. However the whey obtained from the three cheese making process showed similar lactose content. Lactoferrin, serum albumin, beta-lactoglobulin and alpha-lactalbumin passed without changes of concentration from the milk to the whey and no significant differences were found in these proteins. Moreover, no significant differences were found in the percentage of these proteins between the 3 different types of milk used, so the protein profile of cheese whey have not been modified by the centrifugation. After skimming beta-casein showed a statistically significant increase although is was shown a slightly increase in the alphas2-casein concentration. A difference of whey proteins, alphas2-casein, beta-casein and kappa-casein were not detected in cheese whey. The 2% of alphas1-casein was detected in all types of cheese whey of total milk protein, thus, part of this protein was lost with the cheese whey. In conclusion: as it was expected, all whey proteins were detected on whey after cheese making. There was also evidenced a small proportion of alphas1-casein independent of the treatment of the milk. Cheese producers must take account of the important losses they are having in cheese whey. Whey chemical composition, specially in the full-fat milk cheeses, had relative high total solids so it can be used to produce ricotta or other milk product. The optimum milk fat content should be established in order to minimize fat losses in the cheese whey however it Ls also possible to reuse the cheese whey when cheese are elaborated with high fat milk.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Goat Associationen_US
dc.source10th International Conference on Goats, p. 29-30en_US
dc.subject3104 Producción Animalen_US
dc.titleChemical composition, density, pH and protein profile of goat milk and goat cheese whey elaborated with 3 different fat contentsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/lectureen_US
dc.typeLectureen_US
dc.relation.conference10th International Conference on Goats - Technological Development and Associate Attempts to a Sustainable Small Livestock Activityen_US
dc.description.lastpage30en_US
dc.description.firstpage29en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Ponenciaen_US
dc.description.numberofpages2en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateSeptiembre 2010en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate19-09-2010-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate23-09-2010-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0184-2037-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4426-0678-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3026-2031-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameSánchez Macías,Davinia-
crisitem.author.fullNameMorales De La Nuez, Antonio José-
crisitem.author.fullNameMoreno Indias,Isabel-
crisitem.author.fullNameArgüello Henríquez, Anastasio-
crisitem.author.fullNameCastro Navarro, Noemí-
Colección:Ponencias
Adobe PDF (292,9 kB)
Vista resumida

Visitas

37
actualizado el 13-abr-2024

Descargas

14
actualizado el 13-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.