Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/123220
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enriqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Indias, Isabelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMorales De La Nuez, Antonio Joséen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartínez de la Puente, Josuéen_US
dc.contributor.authorTorres Krupij, Alexanderen_US
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Macías, Daviniaen_US
dc.contributor.authorArgüello Henríquez, Anastasioen_US
dc.contributor.authorCastro Navarro, Noemíen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T06:57:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-05T06:57:16Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/123220-
dc.description.abstractFeeding with milk replacers (MR) have been widely used in rearing goat kids and lambs. The advantages of this system are: reducing milk feeding, labor costs and simplifying management. On the other hand, whole powdered milk (CM) could be a good feeding source due to it is cheaper than milk replacers; however there is no information about their use on growth and immune parameters of goat kids and lambs. For this reason the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of feeding source on IgG, IgM, Chitotriosidase activity (ChT), complement system activity (total and alternative) and weight evolution on goat kids and lambs. In this study 12 goat kids and 12 lambs (males and females) were divided in two groups (MR and CM groups). Blood samples were taken each day from birth to 5 days after that and at days 20 and 35. Weight was recorded twice weekly. The IgG and IgM concentration were determine using a commercial ELISA kit, while ChT was measured using a fluorescence assay and the Complement System activity (total and alternative) was measured according to the hemolysis rate. Results showed that there were no differences in IgG and IgM concentration or complement system activity (total and alternative) between feeding sources in both species. In reference to ChT, no differences were observed, except for the CM group which recorded higher ChT than MR group at day 35. Finally, no weight differences were found in the studied period, although lambs obtained a higher weight than goat kids at day 20 and 35 after birth. In conclusion, CM did affect neither immune parameters nor weight evolution, so feeding with whole powdered cow milk can be considered as a safe and economical option to raise goat kids and lambs.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Goat Associationen_US
dc.source11th International Conference on Goatsen_US
dc.subject3104 Producción Animalen_US
dc.titleBlood immunoglobulin concentration (IgG and IgM), Chitotriosidase activity and complement activity of kids and lambs raised with milk replacer and powered cow milken_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/lectureen_US
dc.typeLectureen_US
dc.relation.conference11th International Conference on Goatsen_US
dc.description.lastpage25en_US
dc.description.firstpage25en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Ponenciaen_US
dc.description.numberofpages1en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateSeptiembre 2012en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate24-09-2012-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate27-09-2012-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2729-0434-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0184-2037-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4426-0678-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3026-2031-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enrique-
crisitem.author.fullNameMorales De La Nuez, Antonio José-
crisitem.author.fullNameArgüello Henríquez, Anastasio-
crisitem.author.fullNameCastro Navarro, Noemí-
Colección:Ponencias
JPEG (339,55 kB)
Vista resumida

Visitas

71
actualizado el 28-sep-2024

Descargas

2
actualizado el 28-sep-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.