The fish family Muraenidae: an ideal group for testing at small-scale the coherency of Macaronesia as a biogeographic unit, with the first report on separate fishery statistics

1 Applied Marine Ecology and Fisheries, i-UNAT, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. (JAG) (Corresponding author) E-mail: pepe.solea@ulpgc.es. ORCID-iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8584-6731 (JML) E-mail: josemaria.lorenzo@ulpgc.es. ORCID-iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3752-5209 2 Instituto do Mar, Cova de Inglesa, CP 132, Mindelo, São Vicente, Cabo Verde. (SC) E-mail: sandra.correia@imar.gov.cv. ORCID-iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7619-2801 (CAM) E-mail: monteiro.carlos@imar.gov.cv. ORCID-iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-541X 3 Spanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO), Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Farola del Mar 22, Dársena Pesquera, 38180 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. (SJ) E-mail: sebastian.jimenez@ieo.es. ORCID-iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-4096 (GG-L) E-mail: jgustavo.gonzalez@ieo.es. ORCID-iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9594-7648 4 Direção Regional do Mar, Serviço de Monitorização, Estudos e Investigação, Avenida do Mar e Comunidades Madeirenses 23, 1°E, 9000-054 Funchal, Madeira, Portugal. (JD) E-mail: joao.delgado@madeira.gov.pt. ORCID-iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4268-7202 5 IMAR Institute of Marine Research / Okeanos R&D Centre / Department of Oceanography and Fisheries University of the Azores, 9901-862 Horta, Azores, Portugal. (MRP) E-mail: mario.rr.pinho@uac.pt. ORCID-iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8045-2546


INTRODUCTION
Moray eels (Osteichthyes: Muraenidae) are a diverse group that are distributed worldwide in tropical and temperate seas from intertidal to deep waters. Adults are benthic, generally living in shallow water among rocks and coral heads; many species are more active at night and hide in holes, crevices and other shady zones during the day. Scavengers and predators, they feed mainly on benthic crustaceans, small fishes and cephalopods, but some species (Echidna) are durophagous. Their larvae (leptocephali) are epipelagic, widespread and abundant, and the species' dispersal success over a broad geographical range could putatively be attributed to their long larval stage (Bauchot 1986, Tang and Fielitz 2013, Froese and Pauly 2020. Moray eels are key components of the marine ecosystems, but their relationships remain poorly understood (Jiménez et al. 2007, Tang andFielitz 2013).
The family Muraenidae is one of the largest and most recognizable eel groups. It is represented by 16 genera with 202 valid species according to Froese and Pauly (2020) and 217 species according to Fricke et al. (2020), 34 of which (belonging to eight genera) occur in the Atlantic Ocean and, of these, 26 (eight genera) occur in the eastern Atlantic (Froese and Pauly 2020). Anar-chias euryurus (Lea, 1913) is currently considered as a synonym of Anarchias longicauda (Peters, 1877) (Fricke et al. 2020) by taxonomic decision of Böhlke et al. (1989). Gymnothorax flavimarginatus (Rüppell, 1830) and Gymnothorax meleagris (Shaw, 1795) must be considered Indo-Pacific species, because their respective occurrences in Transkei and Algoa Bay, South Africa are in the Indian Ocean. The non-documented occurrence of Gymnothorax funebris Ranzani, 1839 at Cabo Verde is not accepted as valid, because we have found no report for this country, and nor have Wirtz et al. (2013).
The aim of this work is to study the muraenid species occurring around the volcanic archipelagos of the Azores, Madeira, Selvagens, Canary and Cabo Verde islands (eastern-central Atlantic), to analyse their biogeographic patterns and to compare this group composition among archipelagos. We then check whether the hypothesis that this fish group, due to its biological and biogeographic characteristics, can be used to test at small-scale the coherency of Macaronesia and its direct biogeographic units: i.e. the Azores, Webbnesia and Cabo Verde, as proposed in recent papers (Freitas et al. 2019). Additionally, for the first time separate landing statistics for this group are given and analysed by species or groups of species from each archipelago, to contrast the biogeographic results.

Study area and biogeographic analysis
The present combined list covers all valid marine species of moray eels (Muraenidae) occurring around the volcanic archipelagos of the Azores, Madeira, Selvagens, Canary and Cabo Verde islands from intertidal to deep waters (Fig. 1).
Each species was classified into five biogeographic pattern categories as follows: circumtropical or pantropical (PANT); amphi-Atlantic of warm affinity (AAWA); Atlanto-Mediterranean (ATLM); Guinean restricted to tropical/subtropical eastern Atlantic (TSEA); and eastern-central Atlantic islands from the Azores to Cabo Verde islands and southwards to St. Helena islands (ECAI) (González 2018). To compare the taxon composition among archipelagos, the number of valid species was calculated. To compare the species' biogeographic patterns (affinity) among archipelagos, a description of different components of the family was performed according to the zoogeographic categories established above.

Sources and analysis of landing statistics
Data available on temporal series of landing statistics were taken from official sources: LOTAÇOR (Azores), the Direção Regional do Mar (Madeira); the website of the Canary Islands Government (www. gobiernodecanarias.org/agp/sgt/temas/estadistica/pesca/index.html) and the Instituto do Mar (former Instituto Nacional de Desenvolvimento das Pescas, INDP). In the case of Cabo Verde, disaggregated statistics by species or groups of species were reconstructed from estimated percentages based on relative abundances according to the literature (Monteiro 2008) and observations by the authors from experimental (e.g. Menezes et al. 2004, González et al. 2014) and professional catches and from local fish markets. These landings correspond entirely to catches in its harvested form made by small-scale fleets.
The analysis of variations in landing composition and their relationship to community changes at sea is more robust when disaggregated local landings from multi-specific and multi-gear fisheries are traceable (Fortibuoni et al. 2017). The main aspect to consider is the trend in indices over time rather than the absolute values they assume. With the landing information gathered, a standardized data matrix ((x-mean)/sd) was constructed, whose variables were the annual landings in the 2008-2018 period of the different species in each geographical area, as well as two variables that represent the aggregate landings of the unidentified muraenid species at the species level called Remaining_North (the Azores, Madeira and Canary islands) and Remain-ing_South (Cabo Verde). This distinction was due to the marked differences in the specific composition of these aggregates. In addition, a variable resulting from the relationship between the muraenid landings and the total demersal fish landings per year (Muraenidae_ LDF) was included, in order to weigh the importance of these resources in the different archipelagos.
To test for spatio-temporal differences in the Muraenidae landings among the four geographical zones, a non-parametric ANOSIM two-way crossed test was performed on a distance-based similarity matrix (Clarke and Warwick 1994). When a significant difference (p<5%) was detected, a similarity percentage analysis (SIMPER) was conducted to determine the contribution of the variables to dissimilarities between samples grouped according to design factors (year and archipelago) (Clarke and Warwick 1994). Non-parametric multidimensional scaling ordination (nMDS) was used to examine the temporal behaviour of the landings grouped by geographical origin. All multivariate procedures were performed with the PRIMER v6 statistical package (Clarke and Gorley 2006).

Brief description of the fishing techniques for moray eels in the region
Moray eels are to a greater or lesser extent a popular food fish in the studied archipelagos. In the Azores, they are a bycatch or secondary target of fisheries rather than a fishery resource exploited as such. They are caught using longlines, handlines and fish traps (Gallagher et al. 2012) and are locally consumed at moderate levels. In Madeira, they are caught using handlines, small longlines and fish traps, and also with a highly selective trap. A traditional fishing modality during low tide was based on constrictor-knot devices, but it fell into disuse. This seafood is a snack enjoyed by many local fish consumers and tourists (Nunes 1994) and is also used in stews by some connoisseurs of the product. In the Canaries, it is much appreciated, and is exploited from the intertidal to deep waters using varied fishing gear: a highly selective trap ("tambor"), traditional fish traps, longlines, handlines, harpoons and constrictor-knot-based devices (González 1991, Franquet and Brito 1995, González et al. 2020a. Muraena augusti is the main target of a selective fishery with tambor in this archipelago. In the recent past, moray eels constituted a complementary food resource for a part of the regional agricultural population, which used ingenious fishing tools to catch them in the intertidal zone, including songs and whistles, making this practice part of popular folklore (Jiménez 1997). They currently have a relatively high gastronomic interest, especial-ly in typical restaurants. In Cabo Verde, they are very much appreciated and are caught from the intertidal to the intermediate shelves using harpoons and handlines (Monteiro 2008, González et al. 2020b) and with small longlines; none of the fish traps affect any demersal resource. They have a very high gastronomic interest, being the most typically consumed appetizer in the country. In the Canary and Cabo Verde islands they are also the object of sport fishing and poaching.

Systematic checklist, biology and biogeographic patterns
This systematic list includes a combined checklist of Muraenidae occurring at the five studied archipelagos supported by bibliographic references, as well as updated information on species' habitat and bathymetric range, geographic distribution and biogeographic pattern. The report of Echidna catenata (Bloch, 1795) from the Cabo Verde islands is a mistaken record (Wirtz et al. 2013). The muraenid species occurring in the currently studied archipelagos are presented in Table 1. A total of 18 muraenid moray eels are listed as follows.
Family Muraenidae Rafinesque, 1810 Subfamily Muraeninae Rafinesque, 1815 Echidna peli (Kaup, 1856) Pebbletooth moray On rocky shallow-water zones to at least 20 m depth. Distribution: Cabo Verde and the islands of São Tomé and Annobon in the Bay of Biafra; also on the west coast of Africa from Cape Blanc, Mauritania to Cape Lopez, Gabon. TSEA. (Lowe, 1838) Fangtooth moray

Enchelycore anatina
On rocky bottoms at depths of 0 to 60 m. An insular species in the eastern-central Atlantic from the Azores, Madeira (type locality), Selvagens, Canaries, Cabo Verde, Ascension (Wirtz et al. 2017), and St. Helena (Blache 1967); also in the western Atlantic from Bermuda (extinct due to habitat loss, Dulvy et al. 2003) to Brazil. An Atlantic range-expanding alien species within the Mediterranean, with records from Malta to Israel (Marletta and Lombardo 2020). AAWA.
Enchelycore nigricans (Bonnaterre, 1788) Viper moray On rocky and coral areas from shallow waters to at least 60 m depth. Distribution: Cabo Verde, the islands of Bay of Biafra and Ascension Island, and from Senegal to Gabon; also in the western Atlantic from Bermuda, Bahamas, and Florida to Brazil, and in the western Pacific from Philippines (Villoso et al. 1983) and Taiwan (Huang 2001). PANT.
Gymnothorax afer (Bloch, 1795) Dark moray On rocky bottoms in shallow waters from 10 m to at least 45 m depth. Reported from Cabo Verde and the islands of the Bay of Biafra, and on the west coast of Africa from Mauritania to Angola. TSEA. (Böhlke and Brito, 1987) Canary moray

Gymnothorax bacalladoi
On rocky and rubble bottoms from 5 to 20 m depth. The report of an individual at 604 m depth in Canaries is a labelling mistake (Brito et al. 2002). Distribution: Madeira, the Canary (type locality) and Cabo Verde islands. ECAI.

Gymnothorax maderensis (Johnson, 1862) Sharktooth moray
Among rocks and corals, at depths of 85 to 300 m, mainly from 120 m depth. Distribution: Madeira (type locality), Canary and Cabo Verde islands, Meteor Seamount and Benin; also in the western Atlantic from Bermuda and North Carolina to Brazil (Carvalho Filho and Paiva 2017). AAWA. (Kaup, 1856) Goldentail moray

Gymnothorax miliaris
On coral reefs and rocky coasts, from shorelines to depths of 60 m. In the eastern Atlantic it is an insular species inhabiting the Canary, Cabo Verde, Ascension and St. Helena islands; also in the western Atlantic from Bermuda, Bahamas and Florida to Brazil and St. Paul's Rocks, Trindade and Martin Vaz Islands. AAWA. (Poey, 1875) Polygon moray

Gymnothorax polygonius
On rocky substrates, mainly between 90 and 300 m depth, but rare records from 27 and 600 m. Distribution: Madeira, Canary, Cabo Verde and St. Helena islands; also in the western Atlantic from North Carolina to Brazil. AAWA. (Delaroche, 1809) Brown moray

Gymnothorax vicinus
On rocky and coral reef areas, also seagrass beds at depths between 5 and 145 m; sometimes found in the open. Distribution: Canary and Cabo Verde islands, islands of the Bay of Biafra, and Ascension Island. Records from the Azores, Madeira and St. Helena are erroneous (Smith and Brito 2016). Also in the western Atlantic from Bermuda, the Bahamas and Florida south to Brazil. AAWA. (Parr, 1930) Redface moray

Monopenchelys acuta
On coral heads, rocky ledges and rubble bottoms at depths of 13 to 54 m. Distribution: Cabo Verde and Ascension islands; also in the western Atlantic islands of the Bahamas and Caribbean; and in the Indo-Pacific from the Hawaii, Fiji, Seychelles, Comoros and Agalega islands. PANT. (Kaup, 1856) White-eyed moray, black moray On littoral rocky bottoms and tide pools, where it lurks under big stones or in rock holes at depths of 0 to 250 m, most frequently to 50 m; occasionally found in the open in daytime. Distribution: Azores, Madeira (type locality), Selvagens, Canaries and Cabo Verde. ECAI. (Linnaeus, 1758) Mediterranean moray

Muraena helena
On rocky areas from shorelines to depths as great as 801 m, more commonly to 300 m; occasionally encountered in the open. Distribution: the Azores, Madeira, Selvagens, Canary, and Cabo Verde islands, and on the west coast of Africa from Rio de Oro, Western Sahara to Senegal. Also in the Mediterranean and the European coasts as far as Belgium, the British Isles and the Irish Sea (Quigley and Flannery 2004). ATLM. (Kaup, 1859) Honeycomb moray

Muraena melanotis
On rocky bottoms, from shallow waters to depths of 45 m. Distribution: Cabo Verde and the islands of the Bay of Biafra; also on the west coast of Africa from Mauritania to Angola. Records from the Canary and St. Helena islands are erroneous (Smith and Brito 2016). Also known from Trinidad and Tobago (Ramjohn 1999), Brazil (Floeter et al. 2003) and St. Paul's Rocks (Feitoza et al. 2003) in the west Atlantic. AAWA. (Osório, 1911) Stout moray

Muraena robusta
On rocky areas from shallow waters to depths of 68 m. Distribution: Cabo Verde (type locality) and the islands of the Bay of Biafra; also on the west coast of Africa from Mauritania to Angola. Records from the Canary Islands are erroneous (Smith and Brito 2016). Also in the western Atlantic from North Carolina to Colombia. AAWA.

Subfamily Uropterygiinae Fowler, 1925
Anarchias longicauda (Peters, 1877) Bluntnose moray At depths of 10 to 100 m. Distribution: the Azores, Madeira, Canary (Jiménez 1997), Cabo Verde (type locality) and Bay of Biafra islands; also on the west coast of Africa from Morocco to the Congo and in the western Mediterranean (at least from France, Béarez et al. 2017). ATLM. (Richardson, 1845) Broadbanded moray

Channomuraena vittata
On rocky bottoms, in shallow waters at depths of 5 to 100 m. Distribution: Cabo Verde and Annobon, São Tomé and Ascension islands; also in the western Atlantic and the Indo-West Pacific. PANT. (Blache, 1967) Jigsaw moray

Uropterygius wheeleri
In shallow waters. Distribution: Cabo Verde (type locality) and the islands of the Bay of Biafra; also on the west coast of Africa from Senegal. TSEA.

Analysis of biogeographic patterns and comparison among archipelagos
For each archipelago, the number of occurring genera and species and the percentage of species within each generic group are presented in Table 2, and the number and percentage of species within each species' biogeographic pattern are presented in Table 3.
The Selvagens Islands are not included in this biogeographical analysis because, as a result of their small size, remote location and harsh sea conditions, only a few studies have been conducted to describe their marine species diversity (Almada et al. 2015).  Table 4; statistics were grouped by species or groups of species according to their availability at each regional/national source.

Analysis of fishery landing statistics
Separate landing statistics are given for the first time for moray eels, disaggregated by species or groups of species from each archipelago. Landings reached mean values (in metric tonnes per year, t y -1 ) and percentages over total demersal landings as follows: 61.5 t y -1 (1.8%) in the Azores, 1.9 t y -1 (0.001%) in Madeira, 103.7 t y -1 (6.3%) in the Canaries and 144.5 t y -1 (3.   naries. G. vicinus (42.0%), M. robusta (23.0%) and M. melanotis (21.0%) were the most fished muraenids in Cabo Verde (Table 4). The similarity analysis between samples only detected as significant differences those generated by the spatial factor (ANOSIM, R=0.981; p=0.02%), considering the interannual variations to be non-significant (R=0.058; p=78.6%). Differences between archipelagos were significant for all pairwises (p<0.05% in all cases). The spatial segregation of the samples was evident in the ordination of the nMDS (Fig. 2), with those corresponding to Cabo Verde being placed to the right compared with the arrangement to the left of the remaining three archipelagos. In addition, the separation between these zones was also evident, as three well-differentiated groups were formed, composed exclusively of samples from each archipelago.
The marked differences between Cabo Verde landings and those of the other archipelagos were mainly due to their uneven specific composition, with the SIMPER analysis assigning the greatest contribution to the dissimilarity to the rest of the areas to the tropical species M. robusta, G. vicinus and M. melanotis (Table 5). One exception was observed in the case of the Canary Islands, where the analysis placed M. augusti at the same level of contribution as tropical species. In the northern archipelagos group, the greatest contribution of muraenid landings with respect to the total of demersal fish (Muraenidae_LDF) (Fig. 3), together with M. augusti landings, characterized the divergences of the Canary Islands from Madeira and the Azores, the values being in both cases higher in the Canaries. In turn, in this archipelago the volume of aggregate landings for unidentified muraenid species was much higher (Table 4).

Verification of the coherence of the biogeographic units proposed for the region
Moray eels of both subfamilies occur in all currently studied archipelagos. Of the 18 species identified, 5 occur in the Azores, 8 in Madeira, 10 in the Canaries and all 18 in Cabo Verde.
The genus Anarchias Jordan and Starks, 1906 and its direct child A. longicauda (an Atlanto-Mediterranean species that is the only Anarchias form in the region) occur in all the archipelagos. At a generic level, Channomuraena Richardson, 1848 (with the pantropical C. vittata), Uropterygius Rüppell, 1838 (with the Guinean U. wheeleri) and Echidna Forster, 1788 (with the Guinean E. peli) only occur in Cabo Verde. At a specific level, the pantropical E. nigricans and M. acuta, the amphi-Atlantic of warm affinity M. melanotis, and the Guinean G. afer and M. robusta only occur around Cabo Verde. These restricted occurrences markedly reflect a significant difference in the muraenid biota of the southermost archipelago in comparison with the others.
Madeira (8 species) and the Canary Islands (10 species) harbour a similar number of muraenid species, doubling the number in the Azores (5 species). Of these, 7 species are shared between Madeira and the Canary Islands, which are located in the central zone of the study area. Of these species, the endemic G. bacalladoi and the amphi-Atlantic of warm affinity G. maderensis and G. polygonius are not present in Azorean waters. These data suggest a significant difference in the muraenid biotas between the northermost and central archipelagos.
The amphi-Atlantic of warm affinity G. miliaris and G. vicinus are shared by Cabo Verde and the Canary islands. In fact, in the Canaries both species are restricted to a few localities of the westernmost islands with the warmest waters. However, in recent years these warm-affinity species seem to be trying to move towards the islands closer to the African coasts (some individuals have been caught in Tenerife and Gran Canaria), probably in the current scenario of tropicalization of fish assemblages in temperate biogeographic transition zones (Wirtz et al. 2008, Horta Costa et al. 2014. The percentage of species of Gymnothorax Bloch, 1795 increases gradually from north to south, with the lowest value in the Azores (one species, 14.3%) and the highest in Cabo Verde (seven species, 100%). Val- ues for Madeira (four species, 57.1%) and the Canaries (six species, 85.7%) differ markedly from the ones for the Azores and Cabo Verde. Moreover, Cabo Verde once again stands out from the other archipelagos, also reaching 100% for the other genera of the family. The combined percentage of warm-affinity species increases gradually from north to south, with the lowest value in the Azores (one AAWA species, 20.00%) and the highest in Cabo Verde (13 species, 75.00%, of which 7 AAWA, 3 TSEA and 3 PANT). In the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands there areno representative moray eels of TSEA or PANT zoogeographic categories, which are exclusive to Cabo Verde. Conversely, it can be also observed that the percentage of Atlanto-Mediterranean moray eels decreases gradually from north to south, with the the highest value in the Azores (three species, 60.00%) and the lowest in Cabo Verde (three, 16.67%).
Finally, values of warm-affinity species for Madeira (three, 37.50%) and the Canaries (five, 50.00%) clearly differ from the ones for the Azores and Cabo Verde. This set of evidence suggests that the Cabo Verde islands have a divergent muraenid taxon composition with a high level of dissimilarity, supporting the hypothesis that this tropical archipelago forms its own ecoregion biogeographically within the West African Transition province of the Tropical Atlantic realm (Spalding et al. 2007). The present results also support the argument that Cabo Verde should be given the status of a biogeographic sub-province within the above-mentioned province (Freitas et al. 2019). In the northern part of the study area, the Azores also exhibit marked differences in the composition of taxa, with a high level of dissimilarity, suggesting that this temperate archipelago should be given the status of its own ecoregion within the Lusitanian province of the Temperate Northern Atlantic realm (Freitas et al. 2019). Madeira and the Canaries share most of the taxon composition, with a high level of similarity between them, and they also show marked zoogeographic differences from the Azores northwards and the Cabo Verde southwards. Therefore, in agreement with Freitas et al. (2019), a new ecoregion, Webbnesia, comprising Madeira, Selvagens and the Canary Islands should be defined within the Lusitanian province.
Because of its taxonomic composition and biological and biogeographic characteristics, the family Muraenidae has successfully tested the starting hypothesis as an ideal group for verifying the coherence of the biogeographic units proposed for the region in the recent scientific literature.

First report on separate landing statistics for moray eels in the region
Neither the first edition (Böhlke 1981) nor the most recent edition (Smith and Brito 2016) of the FAO Species Identification Sheets for Fishery Purposes for the eastern-central Atlantic (fishing area 34, 47 in part) contain fishery statistics referring to muraenid moray eels. The same applies to FAO fishing area 10.a.2 (Azores).
As expected, the study of the landings of the analysed species corroborates the differences between the archipelagos highlighted in the biogeographic analysis. In the case of Cabo Verde, the variations compared with the other areas were mainly due to the different specific composition arising from the greater relative importance of warm-affinity species. At the other extreme is the Azores, whose landings had the lowest biodiversity, with only three species represented and dominated by M. helena. Although the specific composition of the landings was similar in Madeira and the Canary Islands, however, significant differences were found between both archipelagos that would be in disagreement with the biogeographic unit (Webbnesia) proposed by Freitas et al. (2019). Such divergences are mainly due to the fact that the volume of the landings of this group together with the relative importance of M. augusti in the Canaries distinguished this archipelago from the rest of the northern islands (Madeira and the Azores). Furthermore, the contribution of the aggregate landings, mainly consisting of G. polygonius and G. unicolor, was much higher than that obtained in Madeira and the Azores. In the last five years, the fishing activity of the métier targeting demersal resources in Madeira recorded an effort (fishing days) that was always less than 1500 days and a total volume of landings of less than 100 t, while in the Canaries the effort was always greater than 28000 fishing days and the landings varied from just over 1000 to over 2000 t in 2018 (RCG 2019).
Therefore, the Canary Islands differ within the central biogeographic group because of socioeconomic factors, as these resources are highly appreciated and demanded by the population. This archipelago also differs from the fishing point of view, with the use of a specific and a highly selective gear (tambor), which is used from the shallow and provides high catches of M. augusti and, to a lesser extent, of G. unicolor. High catches of muraenid fish are made as bycatch in the pandalid shrimp fishery using bottom traps, which are deployed deeper and catch mainly M. helena and secondly G. polygonius (González et al. 2020a). In addition, the Canary Islands have a larger area of fishing grounds.
Fishery statistics are the primary tool for measuring the performance of a fishery within the social, economic, biological and environmental framework in which it is conducted. The need for reliable and comprehensive statistics has always been extremely important, particularly at present because they form the essential basis for planning sustainable fishing and environmental protection within the precautionary approach. Regional databases are required to conduct studies on shared resources of transboundary fish stocks, and development of regional databases is essentially a matter of standardization and harmonization (Bazigos 1983, Stamatopoulos 2002. Demersal resources, and particularly the moray eel landings, should be monitored regularly, and it is recommended to take management actions to ensure that their stocks are not depleted further.