|Title:||Comparing the fully stressed design and the minimum constrained weight solutions in truss structures||Authors:||Greiner, David
Emperador, José M.
|UNESCO Clasification:||1206 Análisis numérico||Keywords:||Structural design
Fully stressed design
Minimum constrained weight
|Issue Date:||2015||Publisher:||Springer||Journal:||Computational Methods in Applied Sciences||Conference:||European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, (ECCOMAS 2014)||Abstract:||The optimization structural design problems of Fully Stressed Design (FSD) and Minimum Constrained Weight (MCW) are compared in this work in a simple truss test case with discrete cross-section type bar sizing, where both optimum designs are coincident. An analysis of the whole search space is included, and the optimization behaviour of evolutionary algorithms are compared with multiple population sizing and mutation rates in both problems. Results of average, best and standard deviation metrics indicate the success and the robustness of the methodology, as well as the fastest and easiest behaviour when considering the FSD case.||URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10553/54814||ISBN:||978-3-319-20405-5||ISSN:||1871-3033||DOI:||10.1007/978-3-319-20406-2_2||Source:||Evolutionary Algorithms and Metaheuristics in Civil Engineering and Construction Management / Magalhães-Mendes J., Greiner D. (eds). Computational Methods in Applied Sciences [ISSN 1871-3033], v. 39, p. 17-32|
|Appears in Collections:||Capítulo de libro|
checked on Dec 3, 2023
checked on Aug 19, 2023
Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.