Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/106469
Título: Practice Patterns of Spine Surgeons Regarding Osteoporosis: An International Survey
Autores/as: Díaz-Romero Paz, Ricardo Fernando 
Sosa Henríquez, Manuel José 
Armas Melián, Kevin
Balhen-Martin, Claudia
Clasificación UNESCO: 32 Ciencias médicas
3213 Cirugía
Palabras clave: Spine surgeons
Osteoporosis
Surgery
Fecha de publicación: 2021
Publicación seriada: International Journal of Spine Surgery 
Resumen: Background Osteoporosis (OP) represents a great challenge for the spine surgeon. Despite having effective pharmacological treatments for OP and surgical technical innovations, the awareness of spine surgeons regarding OP seems low. The purpose of this research was to assess practice patterns on the diagnosis and treatment of spine surgeons regarding OP. Methods An electronic survey of ten multiple-choice questions was administered to members of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). The survey asked about the specialty, the workplace, and practice patterns and attitudes regarding OP and spine fusion surgery, pseudoarthrosis, and vertebral compression fractures (VCF). Results A total of 122 surgeons completed the survey. In patients with suspected OP, 31.4% of surgeons would refer the patient to the OP specialist before surgery and 21.5% chose to perform the surgery without additional studies. A 66.4% of respondents would modify the surgical strategy in the case of OP. The most popular surgical techniques elected were cemented augmented screws (77.9%) and long-segment instrumentation (45.1%). Regarding pseudoarthrosis, 29.5% of surgeons opted to refer to the OP specialist, and 23.8% didn't consider any additional studies Concerning VCF management, 41.32% of respondents would refer the patient for treatment of OP, and the most common therapeutic strategy was conservatively treatment for 4 to 6 weeks and vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty if no improvement (55.74%). There was a higher proportion of surgeons that would not consider preoperative studies or referring patients with suspected OP for spine surgery (χ2 = 4.48, p =0.03) and pseudoarthrosis (χ 2= 9.5, p =0.002) compared to VCF. Conclusions There was a greater awareness regarding optimizing OP management in VCF compared to patients with suspected OP for spine arthrodesis or pseudoarthrosis. There still opportunities for improvement for the timely diagnosis and treatment of OP in spine surgery patients.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/106469
ISSN: 2211-4599
DOI: 10.14444/8049
Fuente: International Journal of Spine Surgery [ISSN 2211-4599], v. 15 (1). (Febrero 2021)
Colección:Artículos
Vista completa

Visitas

112
actualizado el 03-feb-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.